SOUTHERN HUMANITIES REVIEW
  • HOME
    • EVENTS
  • CURRENT ISSUE
    • ONLINE FEATURES
    • REVIEWS
    • STORE
  • ARCHIVES
    • Random Poem Retrieval
    • The 1960s
    • The 2010s
    • The 2020s
  • SUBMISSIONS
    • Submit
    • Auburn Witness Poetry Prize
  • ABOUT
  • HOME
    • EVENTS
  • CURRENT ISSUE
    • ONLINE FEATURES
    • REVIEWS
    • STORE
  • ARCHIVES
    • Random Poem Retrieval
    • The 1960s
    • The 2010s
    • The 2020s
  • SUBMISSIONS
    • Submit
    • Auburn Witness Poetry Prize
  • ABOUT
Search by typing & pressing enter

YOUR CART

BOOK REVIEW

Dan Albergotti’s The Use of the World

By Paul Scot August     DECEMBER 19, 2014


From nearly the beginning of recorded literature, poets have been looking for some sort of spiritual meaning in their lives and searching for it with their words—or questioning their particular brand of god, or their specific pantheon, or railing against the perceived injustice of their actions, lamenting their nonexistence, their uselessness, the purposeful ignoring of their prayers. Poets sometimes wonder how things can be so horrific for themselves or others if some holy being is supposed to be watching over them. Yet still they seek answers in the lines of their poetry; but answers are not forthcoming, and the investigation leads to more asking.

The title of Dan Albergotti’s new chapbook derives itself from the “Vale of Soul-making” letter written by the poet John Keats to his brother and sister in 1819:

The common cognomen of this world among the misguided and superstitious is 'a vale of tears' from which we are to be redeemed by a certain arbitrary interposition of God and taken to Heaven—What a little circumscribed straightened notion! call the world if you Please 'The vale of Soul-making' Then you will find out the use of the world.
Albergotti examines the world and its use—the explanations, rationalizations, and excuses—and does so by examining God, god, the gods, mythology, theology, and spirituality. And how does one try to get their mind around something potentially so huge in a forty-two-page chapbook of poetry? By using both the structure and the freedom of poetic forms. In the book's first poem, "Apology in Advance," the speaker of the book lets us know he's tried this quest before and has failed:
I tried to do it in one voice.

We’ve been over this before.

It was as orderly and complete
as my mother’s cross-stich sampler--
the Governor’s Palace in colonial Williamsburg
and the whole goddamned alphabet--
framed by my father at the foot
of the staircase. As flat and even
as the layer of dust that collected
on the top of that frame, on top
of her glossy coffin’s lid.

It made a sort of sense.

It was not this world.

In the very next poem, prayer is invoked along with the idea that the speaker's prayer may be going unheard. This poem, “Invocation,” is the first of a form Albergotti calls an "Albergonnet." Like Elizabeth Bishop’s Inverted Sonnet, or Kim Addenizio’s Sonnenizio form, it’s an invented form that plays on the modern sonnet and works syllabically, beginning with a two-syllable line, each following line increasing by two syllables until lines seven and eight, which both contain fourteen syllables. After line eight, lines decrease by two syllables until the last line, like the first, contains only two syllables. Each pair of lines in the poem rhyme. The effect this form has on the shape of the poem—how it appears on the page—is that of a waving semaphore flag:
O lord
of severed cord
and flesh, lord of fever,
sweat, demetia, and meat cleaver,
lord of curtains set ablaze, of burning,
lord of tumors, of remission, of returning,
lord of time and time alone, lord of space and empty space,
lord without body, without soul, lord without feet or face,
lord of statistics, lord of bodies, lord of death,
lord of breathless hope, lord of hopeless breath,
O lord of every deafened ear,
I know you’ll never hear
in vacant air
this prayer.

What follows are twenty poems that interrogate the idea of violence and destruction in this world and of God and the gods. These poems include four ghazals, one pantoum, a couple of sestina (one of which appears to be hiding in a prose poem), another Albergonnet, one rhyming couplet, a tightly rhymed poem that is a nod to Philip Larkin, a villanelle, and a centerpiece poem that is a sequence of twelve twelve-line American Sonnets, each exploring the mythical world of a blind king and his daughter.

The poem “These Be Hectoring Large-Scale Verses” takes Larkin’s poem about parents and turns its focus onto another kind of parental figure, that of the religious God:

They fuck us up, the father, son,
and most of all the holy ghost--
that vague idea beyond icon,
a wholly insubstantial host.

The four ghazals focus on the world before, during, and after the terrorist attacks of 9/11. Simply titled, they use the destruction brought about on that day to question the uses of God, prayer, temples, mosques, and churches. In “Ghazal For Buildings” Albergotti questions disciples and prophets and how these figures can be twisted to destructive ends:
His parents named him to honor the prophet,
their child who flew the plane into the building.

This Mohammed was disciple of a Saudi man
whose family had made billions in building.
In “Ghazal For Children,” he ponders prayer and the ones who “chose to leap instead of burn”:
No one could say whether he leapt or burned,
that man whose wife was carrying their first child.

In Manhattan and Mecca, men pray to gods
when their wives are with child.

In “Ghazal Of Days,” he takes on the television networks and their “slick production, theme music” they seemed to have already had on hand and ready:
The same footage rolls every five minutes, and it feels
like it’s happening again each time in one unending day.

I don’t know why I listened to The Kinks’ “Days.” It’s different now.
It had never sounded like a lament to God before today.

And finally, in “Ghazal Of Air,” he wonders how this could have happened in a world of belief and faith, remarking on the silence of that day:
A dragonfly seems more to float than fly--
a perfectly indifferent god of air.

What could I believe in today?
There are no engines in the air.

In the long central poem of the book, “Days Spent In One of The Other Worlds,” Albergotti paints a fantasy world of kingdoms and blind kings; beautiful princesses and pitied spiders; magisterial ministers and medieval scholarly priests; undecipherable language and the sufferings of love. But he ends with the knowledge that writing poems to impress a king or win the heart of his daughter is a fool’s errand, and that the poet must do it for himself:
LAST WORDS FROM ONE OF THE OTHER WORLDS

I’m sorry that I have not written you. I’m sorry
that this other world was not the other world
that could save us. I’m sorry that the old, blind king
is old and blind. I’m sorry that this young, beautiful daughter
has disappeared. I’m sorry for the spiders. I’m sorry
for the Minister of Death and Destruction and his many,
many tears. I’m sorry for my disparaging comments
about the priest’s tonsures. (Dear lord of this other world,
forgive me.) I’m sorry that, despite everything, everything
is still not enough. I’m sorry that this world is no better
than any of the other worlds. I’m sorry that this is the world
from which I must tell you Goodbye, goodbye, I’m sorry.

As if to drive home the point, since the reader may still be thinking about these twelve poems in the middle of the book, six poems later, in “Couplet Found Wedged In The Doorway Between Two Worlds,” Albergotti gives us this single rhyming couplet: "But really, there's no other world, no king. / You want a song? Then teach yourself to sing." In what seemed to me, at first glance, to be a poem that is out of character with the rest of the book, Albergotti ends with “Years and Years and Years Later.” This is a poem that references and speaks to (and with) the poet Jack Gilbert. It includes lines from Gilbert’s poems “Tear It Down” and “A Stubborn Ode.” But after a closer reading, this poem became the perfect response and final comment on the title of the book. No matter that the world is a vale of tears, that there is no king, that we will all end up in the ground forever—we all must respond to the suffering and despair with wild beauty. And what if poetry itself is meaningless to change the world?:
What is it we want from poetry? When Jack Gilbert
and I have been put into the earth forever,
what will it mean if someone reads “Tear It Down” or
“Years and Years and Years Later”? Is there still time
to insist? Let my heart be Feral, too wild for every
woman I love. This poem, Jack, is as helpless

as crushed birds, and still I say with you, nevertheless.

Maybe poetry can have more purpose than just to give a reader pause or a nod in agreement. Perhaps poems can instruct, can present deep beauty and cause the heart to be “feral, too wild.” Perhaps poems are capable of sending a specific type of reader into a “saliva-frothing, torch and pitchfork rage,” as Albergotti says in an interview with storySouth. The poems in The Use of The World succeed on all counts.




PAUL SCOT AUGUST is a poet and software developer. He holds a BBA in Management Information Systems and an MA in English and Creative Writing, both from the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. His poems have appeared in The Los Angeles Review, Connotations Press: An Online Artifact, Midwestern Gothic, Hobble Creek Review, Country Dog Review, Sugar House Review, Naugatuck River Review, Dunes Review, Zuzu’s Petals Quarterly, The Cream City Review, Passages North, Scribble Magazine, Poetry Quarterly, and elsewhere.


Picture

The Use of the World. By Dan Albergotti. Unicorn Press, 2013.

CURRENT ISSUE
SUBMIT
EVENTS
ARCHIVES
STORE

Vertical Divider

CONTACT
SOUTHERN HUMANITIES REVIEW
9088 HALEY CENTER
AUBURN UNIVERSITY
AUBURN, AL 36849

[email protected]
334.844.9088

Vertical Divider
Official trademark of Auburn University

DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH
COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS